{"id":79102,"date":"2026-04-22T14:06:17","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T14:06:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dralysstore.com\/blog\/?p=79102"},"modified":"2026-04-22T14:06:18","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T14:06:18","slug":"x-makes-it-more-expensive-to-post-links-through-its-api","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dralysstore.com\/blog\/x-makes-it-more-expensive-to-post-links-through-its-api\/","title":{"rendered":"X makes it more expensive to post links through its API"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Social network X has made it more expensive to post links through its API. The change is designed to thwart spam and \u201cvectors of misuse,\u201d the company said. The new pricing increased costs from $0.01 per link to $0.20<\/p>\n

Last week, the X developer account posted<\/a> changes to its API rates. The two most notable hikes were an increase in link posting price and an increase in posting price, which went up from $0.01 to $0.15 per post.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

These changes are designed to drive healthier developer behavior and curb vectors of misuse.<\/p>\n

More great features & updates coming very soon.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Developers (@XDevelopers) April 16, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

This move might discourage many publications from posting links. For instance, tech news aggregator Techmeme<\/a> stopped adding links to the original articles in its posts on X this week. Instead, the posts say \u201cVisit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

The US DOJ says a former ransomware negotiator pleaded guilty to helping cybercriminals extort companies in cyberattacks in five different incidents (@lorenzofb<\/a> \/ TechCrunch)<\/p>\n

(Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)<\/p>\n

\u2014 Techmeme (@Techmeme) April 21, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

Earlier this week, Techmeme said that the price increase was one of the reasons to remove links, which it said may return later. The publication also cited a Nieman Lab<\/a> study, which noted that including links with posts on X resulted in dropped engagement.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

FYI: We’re now omitting links in @Techmeme<\/a> tweets. Why?<\/p>\n

1. Links limit reach (see embedded study)
2. The cost for posting links using X’s API increased today by 1900%.<\/p>\n

Links may return later, but we’re still exploring how we might accomplish that. https:\/\/t.co\/nqVpp5ymy1<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Techmeme (@Techmeme) April 20, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

X\u2019s head of product, Nikita Bier, refuted the study\u2019s results and said that accounts covered in the study were \u201chabitual headline+link posters\u201d that posted no additional context. He also replied<\/a> to the Techmeme founder Gabe Rivera, that there is \u201cno there is no code that is deboosting links.\u201d <\/p>\n

He added that Techmeme should post a screenshot of reactions to the news along with the link.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Techmeme should screenshot these and put them in the parent post. To succeed with links, the linked content must bleed into the post. pic.twitter.com\/w353RExKVM<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Nikita Bier (@nikitabier) April 20, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

Earlier in the week, Rivera reacted to API price changes and said that this would force news sites to pay hundreds of dollars or post manually. <\/p>\n

\u201cI think they\u2019re saying if you have a news site that tweets links, and you don\u2019t tweet them manually, you now have to pay X hundreds of dollars per month?\u201d he argued<\/a>. <\/p>\n

The debate of X reducing the reach of posts with links is not new. A few years ago, the company cut<\/a><\/span> headlines from the link previews on the platform<\/a> but reverted the change after a few weeks<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission<\/a>. This doesn\u2019t affect our editorial independence.<\/em><\/p>\n